Your source for poker information, culture, and community
Views: 322 (Total: 719)
Date Posted: August 14th, 2009 (5:38pm)

Thanks to all those who contributed comments on yesterdays blog.  It was encouraging to see people are passionate and wanting to share their perspective.  I think where the discussion runs into difficulty is when people are making blanket statements rather than providing specific situations.  While I'm not advocating JackDogWelch's slippery slope of relativistic morals, I do feel that discussing specific situations is necessary to define what is acceptible or not online.

 

Before I get into a couple questions/comments regarding specific situations, I wanted to share part of a previous blog related to this subject.

 

According to Webster's Dictionary, greed is a noun defined as excessive desire.  One person commented to me that the motivation of all cheaters was pure and simply, greed.  Is greed the source for most cheating?  Is it an excessive desire to reach a goal that we go to any means to achieve it? 

 

This is a tricky subject, because society values those who aspire and desire to better.  Where do we draw the line of what is reasonable desire and what is excessive desire that we over step the boundaries of the acceptable.  Society puts up restrictions, guidelines, and rules for most activities.  Looking at professional sports, we see individuals and teams constantly overstepping, side stepping or blatantly disregarding the rules to gain an edge.  If they aren't caught, and succeed, they are lauded as winners and we admire their abilities.  If they are caught, shame is often the result, unless their talents or popularity overcomes the shame.  Those that abide by the rules accepting a reasonable desire have a harder time competing against those that don't.  They must rely on an inner acceptance that they did it the right way, even if they suffer in comparison.

 

I've often heard from die hard sports fans in debates about corked bats, spitballs, and performance enhancing drugs, that if your not cheating your not trying.  Is greed the currency of our nation?  Just don't get caught? Is excessive desire to succeed the acceptable norm?  Is it just bad judgement when we are caught?

 

This discussion can be reformulated into the classic question of do the ends justify the means?  To me greed is just another form of laziness  It is a lack of belief in yourself doing it the 'right' way that you have to take short cuts.  The key word in this discussion is "excessive".  It is a subjective term, because everyone will define it differently.  Gordon Gecko from Wall Street exhorted that "Greed is good!", but look where it brings most who become obsessed with it, in the long run.  Society must continue to provide boundaries and rules of what is deemed acceptable and reasonable desire, but the ultimate responsibility falls on the individual to recognize and deal with the excessive desire within.

 

Returning back to the previous question of what is considered cheating in online poker, I feel it is the responsibility of the online sites to establish the standards.  They host and conduct all online play.  They are responsible for enforcement.  While I respect MinCashFTW's perspective that the regular online community can influence and lobby that effort, smaller groups of individuals deciding on their own what they want to do doesn't make it right.

 

I'll use the example of mariuana in the United States.  It is clearly illegal, except in special states with medical marijuana laws have been established.  And yet there is a pretty pervasive culture that finds nothing wrong with it.  There is quite a bit of use within the youth and alternative culture in the US.  They can lobby to have it de-criminalized, but they don't ultimately decide its legality.  Even if they don't accept the laws, they have little standing to debates the penalties of being caught.

 

Full Tilt's stance on prohibited programs is....

 

In order to maintain the highest standard of integrity in game play, all actions taken in Full Tilt Poker’s games must be executed personally by the individual player at all times, without advice or support from external software programs or algorithms. Further, the use of external player assistance programs designed to provide users with an unfair advantage is prohibited.

It is the sole responsibility of the individual player to adhere to Full Tilt Poker’s rules and standards for acceptable conduct at all times. (They break down the programs and offenses fairly clearly)

 

Full Tilt Site Terms are HERE

 

PokerStarshas their Question and Answers HERE

 

I'm running out of steam on today's entry, but I look forward to hearing specific instance of potential or clear cheating brought up from this ongoing discussion.

Avatar
Zimba Added 8/15/09 10:48pm
Thanks for your response MinCashFTW. No one is saying anyone is cheating. The purpose of the blog is to explore and further discuss the areas around what is considered cheating and what isn't. It is an academic discussion of the ideas, not who is proposing them. Just wanted to make that clear. Your thoughts are well formulated and I appreciate your contribution in this ongoing discussion.
Avatar
MinCashFTW Added 8/15/09 1:14pm
I feel like the rules and security at both major sites for the US players, PokerStars and FullTilt, are up to par. They really do a good job keeping the game as fair as possible. They do have a system for checking if illegal software is running while their poker client is running. Also, they investigate most final tables to see if there was any foul play in terms of changing IP addresses (selling accounts). As players on these sites, you just have to trust they are doing their best to keep the game as fair as possible according to their rules. They cannot enforce a "one player per hand" and it reflects in their ToS in that there are no rules against it. Getting help during a hand from a coach, friend, poker software (that is legal) is simply acceptable at this time in online poker. The only reason live cardrooms have this rule is because it is enforceable, and it helps maintain a more personal 1v1 competition, which is essential to the live arena. Once you step into the online arena, this goes out the window, and as a player who uses this game to pay the bills, it would be detrimental to my success to pretend there is some moral high-ground I should be taking. Calling my approach greedy would be inaccurate because it assumes there is a "right way" to acheive the same goal, which is not the case. The goal as a poker player is to maximize profit, the only way to achieve that goal in my opinion, is to use every possible tool that is not directly against the rules. As long as you aren't using illegal software, and are playing as one account on one ip address, then you arent breaking any of the the sites rules. Using other ways of obtaining advice during a hand is not greedy/unethical.... it is necessity/competitiveness/survival.
Avatar
XPOKERCHIC Added 8/15/09 11:28am
Well my comment is that I tried PokerEdge and it did seem to help me on the cash tables. In the tourneys that I could afford it really did not help. I deleted it from my computer after the trial. Not sure if Fulltilt knew I was using it or not. It really did seem to help. I did feel like I was cheating the other players that may not had the upper hand by knowing my stats. It showed if the person was a fish, shark and other stats that helped with my decision making. I also made notes on the players as usual. I think it can be good if the site allows it. Do the pros use this type of HUD when playing? I know Rexy says she relies on her instincts and that is probably the best solution. If you won big and they took it back because you where using software, that would be horrible. X
Please login to add a comment.
Rounded border

© Poker Curious LLC 2009 | All Rights Reserved. | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Map